[wpml_language_selector_widget]

Understanding cSCC

Epidemiology

Non-melanoma skin cancers are the most common form of skin cancer worldwide, with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) being the second most prevalent type.1,2 Affecting over 2 million people globally, the incidence of cSCC has seen a dramatic increase of 310% between 1990 and 2017.1,3 Despite this rise, comprehensive epidemiological data on advanced cSCC are limited, often due to underreporting or exclusion from national cancer registries.4

While metastatic cSCC represents a small percentage of overall cSCC cases, it is the most serious form of keratinocyte cancer. Metastasis occurs in 3% to 5% of patients, leading to significant morbidity and higher mortality rates. These severe cases often necessitate systemic treatments to manage the disease effectively.4

Pathogenesis

Ultra-violet (UV) light exposure is the primary risk factor for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), leading these tumors to harbor high mutational burdens. In treating other malignancies, a high mutation burden has been associated with clinical benefits from antibodies targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint receptor.5 Highly mutated tumors are more likely to express immunogenic tumor neoantigens that attract effector T cells, which can be unleashed by blocking the PD-1 immune checkpoint.6 When T cells infiltrate tumors, they produce signals that cause cells in the tumor microenvironment to express PD-L1, which inhibits T cell activity through the engagement of the PD-1 receptor, allowing for immune invasion. This understanding has driven numerous case reports on using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced cSCC.7,8

Adaptive immunity plays a significant role in the tumorigenesis of cSCC, with up to 10% of tumor-infiltrating cells being T cells. The differentiation of naïve T cells into specialized subpopulations allows for coordinating specific immune responses to diverse threats, including cancer cells (Figure 1).9 Here is an overview of key immune agents involved in tumorigenesis; notably, immunosuppressive cytokines TGF-β and IL-10 are overexpressed in high-grade cSCC.10-12

  • CD8+ T cells (cytotoxic T lymphocyte [CTL]): Capable of killing tumor cells and associated with a good prognosis in various cancers10
  • Th1 Cells: Involved in controlling pathogens in phagocytic cells, producing proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and IL-210
  • Th2 and Th17 Cells: Found within the tumor microenvironment, Th2 cells help B-cells and are involved in extracellular parasite immunity, producing cytokines like IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Th17 cells, involved in antimicrobial immunity, produce proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22. Though generally pro-tumoral, they can display antitumoral responses in some tumors10
  • Treg Cells: Characterized by the production of major suppressive cytokines, including IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β).10 The presence of Treg cells in tumors correlates with a poor prognosis11
  • Th9 Cells: An emerging subset mainly associated with good outcomes in solid tumors, including melanoma10

In patients with cancer, immune dysfunction can result in tumor antigens not being detected. Dendritic cells and T cells may treat these antigens as self rather than foreign, creating regulatory T cell responses rather than effector responses. T cells might not properly seek out tumors or may be inhibited from infiltrating them. Moreover, factors in the tumor microenvironment might suppress the effector cells that are produced.9

Risk Factors

Research has established that exposure to sunlight significantly increases the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).13 cSCC typically appears on sun-exposed areas of the body, such as the face, ears, neck, lips, and backs of the hands, but can also develop in scars or chronic skin sores. Individuals with fair hair, skin, and eye color who have experienced excessive sun exposure are at the highest risk of developing cSCC.14 A strong correlation exists between chronic sun exposure, the number of site-specific sunburns, total site-specific exposure, and the development of cSCC. Consequently, cSCC rates are higher among individuals with outdoor occupations, with the risk increasing with age.

Actinic keratoses (AKs) on sun-damaged skin are among the strongest predictors of cSCC in unaffected individuals. Although only a small proportion of AKs are cSCC precursors, the true rate of malignant transformation of AKs remains unknown. While benign, numerous AKs increase the risk of developing basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cSCC, and melanoma.15 Estimates of progression rates from AK to cSCC vary widely, ranging from 0.025% to 20% per AK lesion per year to 0% to 0.075% per lesion per year.16

Certain medications can increase the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). These include17:

  • Immunosuppressive Agents and Antimetabolites: Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine A, and cyclophosphamide
  • Diuretics: Hydrochlorothiazide
  • Antifungal Medication: Voriconazole, especially among lung or hematopoietic transplant patients
  • JAK Inhibitors: Ruxolitinib, used for myelofibrosis or polycythemia, with cases appearing as early as 11 months after starting therapy
  • Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors: Vismodegib, previously shown to increase cSCC risk but recent studies are inconclusive
  • BRAF Inhibitors: Used in metastatic melanoma treatment, with 19–26% of patients developing cSCC. Combining these with MAPK kinase inhibitors (MEKi) has shown potential in reducing this risk

The risk of cSCC recurrence depends on the tumor’s location and size.18 Lesions on the head and neck, particularly in the “mask area” of the face, are more likely to recur than those on the trunk or extremities. Tumors larger than 2 cm in diameter double the risk of recurrence and triple the rate of metastasis compared to smaller lesions.19 A tumor diameter greater than 2 cm is the risk factor most highly associated with disease-specific death, conferring a 19-fold higher risk compared with tumors less than 2 cm.20

A patient with at least one cSCC is at risk for additional cSCC and other skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma and melanoma.21

References

  1. Chong CY, Goh MS, Porceddu SV, Rischin D, Lim AM. The current treatment landscape of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023;24:25-40. doi:10.1007/s40257-022-00742-8
  2. Rentroia-Pacheco B, Tokez S, Bramer EM, et al. Personalised decision making to predict absolute metastatic risk in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: development and validation of a clinico-pathological model. eClinicalMedicine. 2023;63. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102150
  3. Urban K, Mehrmal S, Uppal P, Giesey RL, Delost GR. The global burden of skin cancer: A longitudinal analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1990-2017. JAAD Int. 2021;2:98-108. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2020.10.013
  4. Dessinioti C, Pitoulias M, Stratigos AJ. Epidemiology of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:39-50. doi:10.1111/jdv.17709
  5. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 Blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2509-2520. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500596
  6. Mandal R, Samstein RM, Lee KW, et al. Genetic diversity of tumors with mismatch repair deficiency influences anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response. Science. 2019;364:485-491. doi:10.1126/science.aau0447
  7. Borradori L, Sutton B, Shayesteh P, Daniels GA. Rescue therapy with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and basosquamous carcinoma: Preliminary experience in five cases. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:1382-1386. doi:10.1111/bjd.14642
  8. Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline. J Urol. 2016;196:1021-1029. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.049
  9. Chraa D, Naim A, Olive D, Badou. T lymphocyte subsets in cancer immunity: Friends or foes. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;105:243-255. doi:10.1002/JLB.MR0318-097R
  10. Bottomley MJ, Thomson J, Harwood C, Leigh I. The role of the immune system in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2009. doi:10.3390/ijms20082009
  11. Azzimonti B, Zavattaro E, Provasi M, et al. Intense Foxp3+ CD25+ regulatory T-cell infiltration is associated with high-grade cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and counterbalanced by CD8+/Foxp3+ CD25+ ratio. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:64-73. doi:10.1111/bjd.13172
  12. Hall ET, Fernandez-Lopez E, Silk AW, Dummer R, Bhatia S. Immunologic characteristics of nonmelanoma skin cancers: Implications for immunotherapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020;40:398-407. doi:10.1200/EDBK_278953
  13. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Solar and Ultraviolet Radiation. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1992. Iarc Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 55. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK401588/).
  14. Sitek A, Rosset I, Żądzińska E, Kasielska-Trojan A, Neskoromna-Jędrzejczak A, Antoszewski B. Skin color parameters and Fitzpatrick phototypes in estimating the risk of skin cancer: A case-control study in the Polish population. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:716-723. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.022
  15. Green AC. Epidemiology of actinic keratoses. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;46:1-7. doi:10.1159/000366525
  16. Werner RN, Sammain A, Erdmann R, Hartmann V, Stockfleth E, Nast A. The natural history of actinic keratosis: A systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169:502-518. doi:10.1111/bjd.12420
  17. Jiang R, Fritz M, Que SKT. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An updated review. Cancers. 2024;16:1800. doi:10.3390/cancers16101800
  18. National Comprehensive Cancer Network®. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Squamous Cell Skin Cancer. Version 1.2024. (https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/squamous.pdf).
  19. Rieger KE, Linos E, Egbert BM, Swetter SM. Recurrence rates associated with incompletely excised low-risk nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:59-67. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.2009.01340.x
  20. Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Baum CL. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:419-428. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.4994
  21. Fania L, Didona D, Di Pietro FR, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: From pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9:171. doi:10.3390/biomedicines9020171

All URLs accessed June 25, 2024

Pin It on Pinterest

Directory
Scroll to Top

For optimized Clinical Trial Tracker use, please utilize Chrome or Firefox browsers